Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics
Journal of Global Economic Development and Policy (JOGEDPOL)
Author Ethics
1. Reporting
Authors must provide information about the research process and results to the editor honestly, clearly, and comprehensively, and keep research data properly and safely.
2. Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that the submitted manuscript is original, written by themselves, sourced from their own ideas, and does not plagiarize the works or ideas of others. Authors are strictly prohibited from transferring the sources available to anyone else’s name.
3. Redundant Submission
Authors must confirm that the submitted manuscript has never been submitted to another publication. If redundancy is found, the editor will reject the manuscript.
4. Authorship
Authors must ensure they meet the authorship requirements in accordance with their field of expertise. The first author (or corresponding author) must be responsible for resolving any issues that arise during the process.
5. Correction of Errors
Authors should promptly notify the editor of any errors found in the manuscript, whether in names, affiliations, information, or other content that may affect the manuscript’s meaning and credibility. Necessary corrections should be announced and addressed immediately.
6. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest that might influence their manuscript.
Editor Ethics
1. Publication Decision
Editors must conduct a thorough, transparent, objective, fair, and wise review process, which forms the basis for accepting or rejecting a manuscript. The editorial board works as a team in the decision-making process.
2. Information Management
Editors must ensure the clear and efficient use and distribution of both printed and electronic information.
3. Peer-Review Distribution
Editors are responsible for distributing manuscripts to reviewers and managing the review and evaluation process.
4. Objectivity and Neutrality
Editors must remain objective, neutral, and honest in assessing manuscripts, regardless of the author’s gender, business affiliation, ethnicity, religion, race, or nationality.
5. Confidentiality
Editors must maintain the confidentiality of all information, especially regarding author privacy and manuscript content.
6. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Editors must avoid conflicts of interest to ensure a smooth and fair review process.
Reviewer Ethics
1. Objectivity and Neutrality
Reviewers must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and committed to scientific truth, regardless of the author’s gender, business affiliation, ethnicity, religion, race, or nationality.
2. Source Clarity
Reviewers should ensure that references and quotations are appropriate and credible. Any errors or irregularities should be reported to the editor for correction by the author.
3. Review Timeliness
Reviewers must respond to manuscripts within the specified peer-review period (maximum 2 weeks) and report any delays to the editorial secretariat.
4. Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must avoid conflicts of interest to ensure a smooth and fair review process.










