Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode RT-PCR Dan Rapid Antigen Test Terhadap Deteksi Dini Infeksi Covid-19 Pada Tenaga Kesehatan

Authors

  • Sekarwati STIKES Prima Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70134/kesteri.v1i1.884

Keywords:

Early Detection, RT-PCR, Rapid Antigen Test, Healthcare Workers, Sensitivity

Abstract

This study aims to compare the sensitivity of RT-PCR and rapid antigen tests in the early detection of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers, a high-risk occupational group. The research employed a cross-sectional design involving healthcare workers from various clinical units. Each participant underwent both rapid antigen and RT-PCR testing using nasopharyngeal specimens. The results show that RT-PCR maintains the highest sensitivity, particularly in individuals with low viral loads. In contrast, rapid antigen tests exhibit lower sensitivity, with a significant decrease in samples with Ct values > 30. However, rapid antigen tests demonstrate high sensitivity in cases with high viral load (Ct ≤ 25), making them useful for rapid initial screening. This study concludes that rapid antigen tests can serve as early detection tools, but RT-PCR confirmation is essential to ensure diagnostic accuracy, especially among asymptomatic or high-risk healthcare workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-11-10

How to Cite

Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode RT-PCR Dan Rapid Antigen Test Terhadap Deteksi Dini Infeksi Covid-19 Pada Tenaga Kesehatan. (2025). Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Terpadu Indonesia, 1(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.70134/kesteri.v1i1.884