Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics of Journal of Integrated Animal and Aquatic Sciences (IGATI)
Author Ethics
Reporting
Authors must present their research processes and results in the fields of animal science, fisheries, and aquatic sciences honestly, clearly, and comprehensively. All data, methodologies, and analyses must be accurately documented and securely stored to enable verification and replication of the research.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that all submitted manuscripts are original works derived from their own research ideas, data, and findings. Plagiarism in any form, including the use of others’ work or ideas without proper acknowledgment, is strictly prohibited. All sources must be appropriately cited.
Redundant Submission
Authors must confirm that the submitted manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration by another journal. Simultaneous submission to multiple journals is unethical and will result in rejection.
Authorship
Authorship is limited to individuals who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the editorial office and for ensuring that all listed authors approve the final manuscript.
Correction of Errors
If authors identify significant errors or inaccuracies in their submitted or published manuscripts, they are obligated to promptly notify the editor and cooperate in correcting or retracting the article when necessary.
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose any financial, institutional, professional, or personal relationships that could potentially influence the research results or their interpretation.
Editor Ethics
Publication Decision
Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts objectively based on scientific merit, originality, relevance to animal and aquatic sciences, and clarity of presentation. Final publication decisions are made by the editorial board in accordance with the journal’s policies.
Information Management
Editors are responsible for ensuring transparency, accuracy, and efficiency in the management and dissemination of published information, both in digital and print formats.
Peer-Review Distribution
Editors assign manuscripts to qualified and competent reviewers and oversee the peer-review process to ensure fairness, quality, and timeliness.
Objectivity and Neutrality
Editors must act impartially and without discrimination based on gender, institutional affiliation, ethnicity, religion, nationality, or political beliefs.
Confidentiality
Editors must safeguard the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts, including author identities and reviewer reports, throughout the editorial and review process.
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Editors must avoid any conflicts of interest with authors, reviewers, or editorial members to maintain integrity and credibility in the publication process.
Reviewer Ethics
Objectivity and Neutrality
Reviewers must assess manuscripts objectively, fairly, and professionally, providing constructive and evidence-based feedback to enhance the scientific quality of the work.
Source Clarity
Reviewers should ensure that cited references are relevant, accurate, and properly acknowledged. Any suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, or ethical misconduct must be reported to the editor immediately.
Review Timeliness
Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within the specified review period (maximum of two weeks) and inform the editor promptly if they are unable to meet the deadline.
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must decline to review manuscripts in which they have financial, academic, or personal conflicts of interest, ensuring an impartial and transparent peer-review process.
