Peningkatan Tanggung Jawab Diri Narapidana Melalui Layanan Konseling Realitas Di Lapas Kelas II A Banyuwangi

Authors

  • Baiq Diyah Ayu Universitas Ibrahimy Author
  • Yohandi Universitas Ibrahimy Author
  • A. Husam Sulaiman Universitas Ibrahimy Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70134/bikoling.v2i3.962

Keywords:

Reality Counseling, Self-Responsibility, Drug Offenders, Prison

Abstract

High recidivism rates among drug offenders indicate the need to reassess correctional interventions, particularly those addressing deficits in personal responsibility. Many prisoners deny their role in addictive behavior and attribute it to external factors. This study examines the effectiveness of Reality Therapy in strengthening personal accountability among inmates at Class IIA Banyuwangi Prison. Using a Single Instrumental Case Study design, the subject was WH (30 years old), a female narcotics offender with a history of minor recidivism and strong tendencies toward denial and self-justification. Data were collected through triangulated qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews, structured behavioral observation using a responsibility rubric, and document analysis. Findings reveal a significant transformation in the subject’s sense of responsibility. Prior to the intervention, the subject demonstrated a limited “Quality World” focused on short-term physical freedom and showed no personal accountability for her offense. A key cognitive shift occurred during the Evaluation stage of the WDEP model, where the subject recognized her behavior as a personal choice. Post-intervention, her responsibility score increased to 6/10, accompanied by more self-directed communication patterns. The study concludes that Reality Therapy is effective in fostering accountability by shifting the locus of control from external blame to conscious choice, highlighting its potential as a rehabilitation approach for drug offenders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Glasser, W. (2011). Choice Theory: A New Psychology of Personal Freedom. Harper Perennial.

Glasser, W., & Glasser, C. (2000). Counseling with Choice Theory: The New Reality Therapy. Perennial Library.

Maruna, S., & Toch, H. (Eds.). (2005). The State of the Art: Research and Theory on Offender Reintegration. Psychology Press.

Moriarty, E. (2018). Integrating Reality Therapy and Motivational Interviewing: Enhancing self-responsibility in mandated clients. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy, 37(2), 15-28.

Nugraha, H. E. D. (2020). Efektivitas Konseling Realitas terhadap Peningkatan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Narapidana Narkotika. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 9(2), 150-165.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.

Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of Criminology (4th ed.). J. B. Lippincott Company.

Van Voorhis, P. (2011). Correctional programming and the reduction of criminal behavior: A look at theory and research. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(1), 57-81.

Wubbolding, R. E. (2011). Reality Therapy: The Art of Counseling and Supervision. American Counseling Association.

Wubbolding, R. E. (2017). Reality Therapy for the 21st Century (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Peningkatan Tanggung Jawab Diri Narapidana Melalui Layanan Konseling Realitas Di Lapas Kelas II A Banyuwangi. (2025). Jurnal Ilmu Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 2(3), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.70134/bikoling.v2i3.962

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-20 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.